Fredrin vs Lovable
Lovable turns a prompt into a hosted full stack app, built inside Lovable and exported to git. Fredrin runs agents on the repository you already ship from, many tickets at once, each ending in a pull request.
The verdict
Pick Lovable.
You want a working, hosted full stack app from a prompt with no setup: database, auth, hosting, domains and payments built in, from a browser, a desktop app or a phone. For going from idea to live product fast, especially as a non-developer, Lovable is excellent.
Pick Fredrin.
You have a real repository and want many changes moving at once on the Claude Code or Codex plan you pay for, each one a branch, a pull request and a review you control.
Side by side.
Lovable gets partial credit wherever it earns it.
| Lovable | Fredrin | |
|---|---|---|
| Build a full stack app from one prompt | via a ticket (partial) | |
| Works on an existing codebase | ||
| Many agent tasks in parallel | drafts, no task board (partial) | |
| Runs on your Claude Code or Codex plan | ||
| Pick the model and effort per task | ||
| Agents run on your own machine | ||
| Talk to your agents by voice | ||
| A plan with verification checks per task | ||
| Own branch and pull request per task | ||
| Scheduled automations that start agents | monitoring scans only (partial) | |
| Plan and merge approvals for a team | roles, no approval gate (partial) | |
| Zero install: build in a browser tab | agents need a machine (partial) | |
| Hosts and deploys your app | ||
| Work from your phone | browser, no app (partial) | |
| Flat price under heavy agent use | credit-metered (partial) |
Why teams switch.
Your repository, not a new one.
Lovable can export to GitHub but cannot import an existing repository, so every project starts inside Lovable. Fredrin starts from the repo you already ship from: each ticket is a branch and a git worktree on your machine, ending in a pull request against your default branch.
Many changes at once, on one board.
Lovable lets you keep several drafts going. Fredrin runs a whole board in parallel, each ticket with its own agent, a plan with verification checks, and a pull request, so the backlog keeps moving while you review.
Your plan, not credits.
Lovable meters every build in credits, and a build's cost varies with its complexity. Fredrin runs Claude Code and Codex on the subscription you already pay for, so a heavy week is the same bill as a quiet one.
Questions
Is Fredrin a Lovable alternative?
For work on a real codebase, yes. Lovable builds and hosts new apps from prompts and can export them to GitHub. Fredrin runs agents on the repository you already have, many tickets at once, each ending in a pull request. If you are starting from nothing and want hosting included, Lovable is the shorter path.
Can I bring an existing project to Lovable or Fredrin?
Lovable is export only: it cannot import an existing repository. Fredrin is built for existing repositories. Open one on your machine and every ticket works in its own worktree of it, following the conventions it already has.
Does Fredrin host my app?
No. Fredrin ships code as pull requests to your repository, and your own hosting deploys it. Lovable publishes and hosts apps itself, which is one of the best reasons to choose it.
How does pricing compare to Lovable's credits?
Lovable is free to start with five build credits a day; Pro starts at $25 a month for 100 credits and Business at $50, and a build's credit cost varies with its complexity. Fredrin is free for up to 5 people, Pro is $20/mo and Team is $29/seat/mo for every member, from the 6th member, and agent runs ride your own Claude Code or Codex plan (Lovable's figures as of October 2026; illustrative, not a quote).
Other comparisons
How Fredrin works
Glossary
Run the whole board.
Free to start, on the AI subscription you already pay for.